Environmental performance of shared micromobility and personal alternatives using integrated modal LCA
arXiv:2103.04464 · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.102743
Abstract
The environmental performance of shared micromobility services compared to private alternatives has never been assessed using an integrated modal Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) relying on field data. Such an LCA is conducted on three shared micromobility services in Paris - bikes, second-generation e-scooters, and e-mopeds - and their private alternatives. Global warming potential, primary energy consumption, and the three endpoint damages are calculated. Sensitivity analyses on vehicle lifespan, shipping, servicing distance, and electricity mix are conducted. Electric micromobility ranks between active modes and personal ICE modes. Its impacts are globally driven by vehicle manufacturing. Ownership does not affect directly the environmental performance: the vehicle lifetime mileage does. Assessing the sole carbon footprint leads to biased environmental decision-making, as it is not correlated to the three damages: multicriteria LCA is mandatory to preserve the planet. Finally, a major change of paradigm is needed to eco-design modern transportation policies.
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Planning sustainable carbon neutrality pathways: accounting challenges experienced by organizations and solutions from industrial ecology
- Banning short-haul flights and investing in high-speed railways for a sustainable future?
- Can autonomy make bicycle-sharing systems more sustainable? Environmental impact analysis of an emerging mobility technology
- How do activity-end trip characteristics affect the choice for shared micromobility? A latent class choice modelling approach for train station egress trips in the Netherlands