Epistemic values in feature importance methods: Lessons from feminist epistemology

Abstract

As the public seeks greater accountability and transparency from machine learning algorithms, the research literature on methods to explain algorithms and their outputs has rapidly expanded. Feature importance methods form a popular class of explanation methods. In this paper, we apply the lens of feminist epistemology to recent feature importance research. We investigate what epistemic values are implicitly embedded in feature importance methods and how or whether they are in conflict with feminist epistemology. We offer some suggestions on how to conduct research on explanations that respects feminist epistemic values, taking into account the importance of social context, the epistemic privileges of subjugated knowers, and adopting more interactional ways of knowing.

Accepted to ACM FAccT 2021

References in corpus (4)

• The Hidden Assumptions Behind Counterfactual Explanations and Principal Reasons
• Human Factors in Model Interpretability: Industry Practices, Challenges, and Needs
• Keeping Community in the Loop: Understanding Wikipedia Stakeholder Values for Machine Learning-Based Systems
• True to the Model or True to the Data?

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Equalizing Credit Opportunity in Algorithms: Aligning Algorithmic Fairness Research with U.S. Fair Lending Regulation
• Subverting machines, fluctuating identities: Re-learning human categorization
• Measurement as governance in and for responsible AI
• What will it take to generate fairness-preserving explanations?