Coherent control techniques for two-state quantum systems: A comparative study
arXiv:2012.15120 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.033110
Abstract
We evaluate various sources of errors that occur when attempting to produce a specified coherent change of a two-state quantum system using six popular coherent control techniques: resonant excitation, adiabatic following, composite adiabatic passage, universal composite pulses, shortcut to adiabaticity, and single-shot shaped pulses. As error sources we consider spatial intensity distribution, transit time variation, inhomogeneous broadening, Doppler broadening, unwanted chirp and shape errors. For the various error types different techniques emerge as the best performers but overall, we find that universal composite pulses perform most consistently and are most resilient to errors compared to all other procedures.
10 pages, 8 figures
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (12)
- Introduction to Theoretical and Experimental aspects of Quantum Optimal Control
- A quantum system control method based on enhanced reinforcement learning
- Robust population inversion in three-level systems by composite pulses
- Supervised learning for robust quantum control in composite-pulse systems
- Composite pulses for high fidelity population transfer in three-level systems
- Enhanced quantum state transfer via feedforward cancellation of optical phase noise
- Quantum optimal control in quantum technologies. Strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe
- Three-state coherent control using narrowband and passband sequences
- Amplification of arbitrary frequency chirps of pulsed light on nanosecond timescales
- Resource state generation for a multispin register in a hybrid matter-photon quantum information processor
- Switching, Amplifying, and Chirping Diode Lasers with Current Pulses for High Bandwidth Quantum Technologies
- Application of the Small Tip-Angle approximation in the Toggling Frame for the design of analytic robust pulses in Quantum Control