QBians Do Not Exist
arXiv:2012.14375
Abstract
We remark on John Earman's paper ``Quantum Bayesianism Assessed'' [The Monist 102 (2019), 403--423], illustrating with a number of examples that the quantum ``interpretation'' Earman critiques and the interpretation known as QBism have almost nothing to do with each other.
12 pages
References in corpus (9)
- Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more)
- QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism
- QBism and the Greeks: why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality
- Respecting One's Fellow: QBism's Analysis of Wigner's Friend
- Information-disturbance tradeoff in quantum measurement on the uniform ensemble and on the mutually unbiased bases
- Does it Make Sense to Speak of Self-Locating Uncertainty in the Universal Wave Function? Remarks on Sebens and Carroll
- Interview with a Quantum Bayesian
- Ideas Abandoned en Route to QBism
- Quantum Measurement and the Paulian Idea