paper

Sets avoiding -term arithmetic progressions in are exponentially small

arXiv:2012.08426

Abstract

Pach and Palincza proved the following generalization of Ellenberg and Gijswijt's bound for the size of -term arithmetic progression-free subsets, where : Let be an integer such that divides and let . Then if is sufficiently large. Building on the proof technique of Pach and Palincza's upper bound we generalize the Ellenberg and Gijswijt's bound in the following way: Let be any integer and let be a prime. Suppose that . Then the there exists an integer and a real number such that for each .

there is a fatal error in the proof of Lemma 1.9

Sets avoiding $p$-term arithmetic progressions in ${\mathbb Z}_{q}^n$ are exponentially small · wovepaper