Forks Over Knives: Predictive Inconsistency in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessment Tools

Abstract

Big data and algorithmic risk prediction tools promise to improve criminal justice systems by reducing human biases and inconsistencies in decision making. Yet different, equally-justifiable choices when developing, testing, and deploying these sociotechnical tools can lead to disparate predicted risk scores for the same individual. Synthesizing diverse perspectives from machine learning, statistics, sociology, criminology, law, philosophy and economics, we conceptualize this phenomenon as predictive inconsistency. We describe sources of predictive inconsistency at different stages of algorithmic risk assessment tool development and deployment and consider how future technological developments may amplify predictive inconsistency. We argue, however, that in a diverse and pluralistic society we should not expect to completely eliminate predictive inconsistency. Instead, to bolster the legal, political, and scientific legitimacy of algorithmic risk prediction tools, we propose identifying and documenting relevant and reasonable "forking paths" to enable quantifiable, reproducible multiverse and specification curve analyses of predictive inconsistency at the individual level.

References in corpus (11)

• To Explain or to Predict?
• Model Cards for Model Reporting
• Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
• Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI
• All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously
• Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress
• Prediction-Based Decisions and Fairness: A Catalogue of Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
• Measurement and Fairness
• A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indices
• Conscientious Classification: A Data Scientist's Guide to Discrimination-Aware Classification
• A Commentary on Statistical Assessment of Violence Recidivism Risk