Similarity network fusion for scholarly journals
arXiv:2011.06795 · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101226
Abstract
This paper explores intellectual and social proximity among scholarly journals by using network fusion techniques. Similarities among journals are initially represented by means of a three-layer network based on co-citations, common authors and common editors. The information contained in the three layers is then combined by building a fused similarity network. The fusion consists in an unsupervised process that exploits the structural properties of the layers. Subsequently, partial distance correlations are adopted for measuring the contribution of each layer to the structure of the fused network. Finally, the community morphology of the fused network is explored by using modularity. In the three fields considered (i.e. economics, information and library sciences and statistics) the major contribution to the structure of the fused network arises from editors. This result suggests that the role of editors as gatekeepers of journals is the most relevant in defining the boundaries of scholarly communities. In information and library sciences and statistics, the clusters of journals reflect sub-field specializations. In economics, clusters of journals appear to be better interpreted in terms of alternative methodological approaches. Thus, the graphs representing the clusters of journals in the fused network are powerful instruments for exploring research fields.
arXiv comment21 pages, 4 figures
References in corpus (7)
- Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
- Finding and evaluating community structure in networks
- Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks
- Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances
- Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge?
- Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals
- Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: an exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations