Density Distribution in Soft Matter Crystals and Quasicrystals

Abstract

The density distribution in solids is often represented as a sum of Gaussian peaks (or similar functions) centred on lattice sites or via a Fourier sum. Here, we argue that representing instead the $logarithm$ of the density distribution via a Fourier sum is better. We show that truncating such a representation after only a few terms can be highly accurate for soft matter crystals. For quasicrystals, this sum does not truncate so easily, nonetheless, representing the density profile in this way is still of great use, enabling us to calculate the phase diagram for a 3-dimensional quasicrystal forming system using an accurate non-local density functional theory.

6 pages, 4 figures, 1 supplementary information PDF, 1 MATLAB program, 1 MAT datafile

References in corpus (1)

• Soft quasicrystals - Why are they stable?

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Rectangle--triangle soft-matter quasicrystals with hexagonal symmetry
• Self-assembly of binary solutions to complex structures
• Amplitude expansion of the phase-field crystal model for complex crystal structures
• Defects Enhance Stability in 12-fold Symmetric Soft-Matter Quasicrystals
• Snaking without subcriticality: grain boundaries as non-topological defects