Do All Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Have A Magnetic Flux Rope Structure Near 1 AU?
arXiv:2009.05212 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abb6ec
Abstract
Interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) often consist of a shock wave, sheath region, and ejecta region. The ejecta regions are divided into two broad classes: magnetic clouds (MC) that exhibit the characteristics of magnetic flux ropes and non-magnetic clouds (NMC) that do not. As CMEs result from eruption of magnetic flux ropes, it is important to answer why NMCs do not have the flux rope features. One claims that NMCs lose their original flux rope features due to the interactions between ICMEs or ICMEs and other large scale structures during their transit in the heliosphere. The other attributes this phenomenon to the geometric selection effect, i.e., when an ICME has its nose (flank, including leg and non-leg flanks) pass through the observing spacecraft, the MC (NMC) features will be detected along the spacecraft trajectory within the ejecta. In this Letter, we examine which explanation is more reasonable through the geometric properties of ICMEs. If the selection effect leads to different ejecta types, MCs should have narrower sheath region compared to NMCs from the statistical point of view, which is confirmed by our statistics. Besides, we find that NMCs have the similar size in solar cycles 23 and 24, and NMCs are smaller than MCs in cycle 23 but larger than MCs in cycle 24. This suggests that most NMCs have their leg flank pass through the spacecraft. Our geometric analyses support that all ICMEs should have a magnetic flux rope structure near 1 AU.
arXiv comment16 pages, 4 figures
References in corpus (18)
- Direct Evidence for a Fast CME Driven by the Prior Formation and Subsequent Destabilization of a Magnetic Flux Rope
- First observations of a dome-shaped large-scale coronal EUV wave
- Properties and Geoeffectiveness of Magnetic Clouds during Solar Cycles 23 and 24
- The First Ground Level Enhancement Event of Solar Cycle 24: Direct Observation of Shock Formation and Particle Release Heights
- Investigation of the Formation and Separation of An EUV Wave from the Expansion of A Coronal Mass Ejection
- Satistical Study of the Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections from 1996 to 2014
- Investigating Two Successive Flux Rope Eruptions In A Solar Active Region
- Estimation of Reconnection Flux using Post-eruption Arcades and Its Relevance to 1-au Magnetic Clouds
- Coronal Flux Ropes and their Interplanetary Counterparts
- Direct observations of magnetic flux rope formation during a solar coronal mass ejection
- The Heliocentric Distance Where the Deflections and Rotations of Solar Coronal Mass Ejections Occur
- Coronal Hole Influence on the Observed Structure of Interplanetary CMEs
- The Solar Connection of Enhanced Heavy Ion Charge States in the Interplanetary Medium: Implications for the Flux-rope Structure of CMEs
- Near-Sun Flux Rope Structure of CMEs
- Identification of Super- and Sub-critical Regions in Shocks driven by Coronal Mass Ejections
- Geometry, Kinematics and Heliospheric Impact of a Large CME-driven Shock in 2017 September
- The Structure of Solar Coronal Mass Ejections in the Extreme-Ultraviolet Passbands
- Radio-loud CMEs from the disk center lacking shocks at 1 AU
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Complete replacement of magnetic flux in a flux rope during a coronal mass ejection
- Ensemble simulations of the 12 July 2012 Coronal Mass Ejection with the Constant Turn Flux Rope Model
- Propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections from the Sun to Earth
- The Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections Recorded by the K-Coronagraph at Mauna Loa Solar Observatory
- Solar Cycle Dependence of ICME Composition
- On the transition from Slow to Fast Wind as Observed in Composition Observations
- Interaction of Trappist-1 exoplanets with coronal mass ejections: Joule heating, Poynting fluxes and the role of magnetic fields