A comparative analysis of denoising algorithms for extragalactic imaging surveys
arXiv:2009.01846 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936278
Abstract
We present a comprehensive analysis of the performance of noise-reduction (``denoising'') algorithms to determine whether they provide advantages in source detection on extragalactic survey images. The methods under analysis are Perona-Malik filtering, Bilateral filter, Total Variation denoising, Structure-texture image decomposition, Non-local means, Wavelets, and Block-matching. We tested the algorithms on simulated images of extragalactic fields with resolution and depth typical of the Hubble, Spitzer, and Euclid Space Telescopes, and of ground-based instruments. After choosing their best internal parameters configuration, we assess their performance as a function of resolution, background level, and image type, also testing their ability to preserve the objects fluxes and shapes. We analyze in terms of completeness and purity the catalogs extracted after applying denoising algorithms on a simulated Euclid Wide Survey VIS image, on real H160 (HST) and K-band (HAWK-I) observations of the CANDELS GOODS-South field. Denoising algorithms often outperform the standard approach of filtering with the Point Spread Function (PSF) of the image. Applying Structure-Texture image decomposition, Perona-Malik filtering, the Total Variation method by Chambolle, and Bilateral filtering on the Euclid-VIS image, we obtain catalogs that are both more pure and complete by 0.2 magnitudes than those based on the standard approach. The same result is achieved with the Structure-Texture image decomposition algorithm applied on the H160 image. The advantage of denoising techniques with respect to PSF filtering increases at increasing depth. Moreover, these techniques better preserve the shape of the detected objects with respect to PSF smoothing. Denoising algorithms provide significant improvements in the detection of faint objects and enhance the scientific return of current and future extragalactic surveys.
arXiv comment30 pages, 55 figures; accepted for publication in A&A
References in corpus (23)
- scikit-image: Image processing in Python
- CANDELS: The Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey
- CANDELS: The Cosmic Assembly Near-infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey - The Hubble Space Telescope Observations, Imaging Data Products and Mosaics
- Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
- The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy - an overview
- 3D-HST WFC3-selected Photometric Catalogs in the Five CANDELS/3D-HST Fields: Photometry, Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Masses
- LSST Science Book, Version 2.0
- Euclid Definition Study Report
- CANDELS Multi-wavelength Catalogs: Source Detection and Photometry in the GOODS-South Field
- The First Fermi-LAT Catalog of Sources Above 10 GeV
- The XMM-LSS survey. Survey design and first results
- Wavelets, ridgelets and curvelets on the sphere
- The Hawk-I UDS and GOODS Survey (HUGS): Survey design and deep K-band number counts
- Machine and Deep Learning Applied to Galaxy Morphology -- A Comparative Study
- Evidence for a fast evolution of the UV luminosity function beyond redshift 6 from a deep HAWK-I survey of the GOODS-S field
- Detection and discrimination of cosmological non-Gaussian signatures by multi-scale methods
- EGG: hatching a mock Universe from empirical prescriptions
- The first catalog of Fermi-LAT sources below 100 MeV
- Astronomical Image Denoising Using Dictionary Learning
- Deep Galaxy: Classification of Galaxies based on Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
- N-body simulations with two-orders-of-magnitude higher performance using wavelets
- Unsupervised feature-learning for galaxy SEDs with denoising autoencoders
- Stellar Cluster Detection using GMM with Deep Variational Autoencoder