Next step in gravity and cosmology: fundamental theory or data-driven models?

Abstract

We comment on the difference between bottom-up (i.e., data-driven, ad hoc) and top-down (i.e., derived from a fundamental theory of gravitational interactions) cosmological models, their respective status, predictive power and viability. We fuel the debate on whether present and future research on theoretical models of inflation, dark energy and gravitational waves should concentrate on bottom-up models such as $f(R)$, Horndeski or DHOST theories or on cosmological models of quantum gravity.

6 pages. Specialty Grand Challenge article prepared for section Cosmology of Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences

References in corpus (11)

• Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point
• Models of f(R) Cosmic Acceleration that Evade Solar-System Tests
• Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
• Disappearing cosmological constant in f(R) gravity
• Horndeski theory and beyond: a review
• Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. IV: Probing inflation with gravitational waves
• Solar system and equivalence principle constraints on f(R) gravity by chameleon approach
• Renormalization group in Lifshitz-type theories
• Inflation and String Theory
• Ghost Constraints on Modified Gravity
• Ekpyrotic Cosmology with a Zero-Shear S-Brane