SETI and Democracy
arXiv:2007.13515 · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.11.053
Abstract
There is a wide-ranging debate about the merits and demerits of searching for, and sending messages to, extraterrestrial intelligences (SETI and METI). There is however reasonable (but not universal) consensus that replying to a message from an extraterrestrial intelligence should not be done unilaterally, without consultation with wider society and the rest of the world. But how should this consultation actually work? In this paper we discuss various ways that decision making in such a scenario could be done democratically, and gain legitimacy. In particular we consider a scientist-led response, a politician-led response, deciding a response using a referendum, and finally using citizens' assemblies. We present the results of a survey of a representative survey of 2,000 people in the UK on how they thought a response should best be determined, and finally discuss parallels to how the public is responding to scientific expertise in the COVID-19 Pandemic
arXiv comment11 pages, 2 figures, accepted Acta Astronautica
References in corpus (7)
- Phosphine Gas in the Cloud Decks of Venus
- Does the rapid appearance of life on Earth suggest that life is common in the Universe?
- An Objective Bayesian Analysis of Life's Early Start and Our Late Arrival
- Reviewing METI: A Critical Analysis of the Arguments
- Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence
- Saturn's Titan: A strict test for life's cosmic ubiquity
- Exoplanet Vision 2050