A unified survey of treatment effect heterogeneity modeling and uplift modeling
arXiv:2007.12769
Abstract
A central question in many fields of scientific research is to determine how an outcome would be affected by an action, or to measure the effect of an action (a.k.a treatment effect). In recent years, a need for estimating the heterogeneous treatment effects conditioning on the different characteristics of individuals has emerged from research fields such as personalized healthcare, social science, and online marketing. To meet the need, researchers and practitioners from different communities have developed algorithms by taking the treatment effect heterogeneity modeling approach and the uplift modeling approach, respectively. In this paper, we provide a unified survey of these two seemingly disconnected yet closely related approaches under the potential outcome framework. We then provide a structured survey of existing methods by emphasizing on their inherent connections with a set of unified notations to make comparisons of the different methods easy. We then review the main applications of the surveyed methods in personalized marketing, personalized medicine, and social studies. Finally, we summarize the existing software packages and present discussions based on the use of methods on synthetic, semi-synthetic and real world data sets and provide some general guidelines for choosing methods.
To appear in ACM Computing Surveys
References in corpus (6)
- Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learning
- Sensitivity and Generalization in Neural Networks: an Empirical Study
- Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Models
- A Survey of Learning Causality with Data: Problems and Methods
- A Decision Theoretic Approach to Targeted Advertising
- Transfer Learning for Estimating Causal Effects using Neural Networks