Critical analysis of the response function in low dimensional materials

Abstract

The presence of sharp peaks in the real part of the static dielectric response function are usually accepted as indication of charge or spin instabilities in a material. However, there are misconceptions that Fermi surface (FS) nesting guarantees a peak in the response function like in one-dimensional systems, and, in addition, response function matrix elements between empty and occupied states are usually considered of secondary importance and typically set to unity like in the free electron gas case. In this work, we explicitly show, through model systems and real materials, within the framework of density functional theory, that predictions about the peaks in the response function, using FS nesting and constant matrix elements yields erroneous conclusions. We find that the inclusion of the matrix elements completely alters the structure of the response function. In all the cases studied other than the one-dimensional case we find that the inclusion of matrix elements washes out the structure found with constant matrix elements. Our conclusion is that it is imperative to calculate the full response function, with matrix elements, when making predictions about instabilities in novel materials.

References in corpus (9)

• Magic-angle graphene superlattices: a new platform for unconventional superconductivity
• Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene
• Correlated Insulator Behaviour at Half-Filling in Magic Angle Graphene Superlattices
• Flat Bands in Slightly Twisted Bilayer Graphene
• Hydrogen on graphene: Electronic structure, total energy, structural distortions, and magnetism from first-principles calculations
• Fermi surface nesting and the origin of Charge Density Waves in metals
• SIESTA: recent developments and applications
• Band Unfolding Made Simple
• Pressure induced magnetism in rotated graphene bilayers