Revisiting Loss Modelling for Unstructured Pruning

Abstract

By removing parameters from deep neural networks, unstructured pruning methods aim at cutting down memory footprint and computational cost, while maintaining prediction accuracy. In order to tackle this otherwise intractable problem, many of these methods model the loss landscape using first or second order Taylor expansions to identify which parameters can be discarded. We revisit loss modelling for unstructured pruning: we show the importance of ensuring locality of the pruning steps. We systematically compare first and second order Taylor expansions and empirically show that both can reach similar levels of performance. Finally, we show that better preserving the original network function does not necessarily transfer to better performing networks after fine-tuning, suggesting that only considering the impact of pruning on the loss might not be a sufficient objective to design good pruning criteria.

References in corpus (5)

• Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
• Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
• The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networks
• Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruning
• Global Sparse Momentum SGD for Pruning Very Deep Neural Networks