A unifying perspective on linear continuum equations prevalent in physics. Part V: resolvents; bounds on their spectrum; and their Stieltjes integral representations when the operator is not selfadjoint

Abstract

We consider resolvents of operators taking the form $\mathbf{A}={\Gamma }_1\mathbf{B}{\Gamma }_1$ where ${\Gamma }_1(\mathbf{k})$ is a projection that acts locally in Fourier space and $\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{x})$ is an operator that acts locally in real space. Such resolvents arise naturally when one wants to solve any of the large class of linear physical equations surveyed in Parts I, II, III, and IV that can be reformulated as problems in the extended abstract theory of composites. We review how $Q^{\ast }$-convex operators can be used to bound the spectrum of $\mathbf{A}$. Then, based on the Cherkaev-Gibiansky transformation and subsequent developments, that we reformulate, we obtain for non-Hermitian $\mathbf{B}$ a Stieltjes type integral representation for the resolvent $(z_0\mathbf{I}-\mathbf{A}{)}^{-1}$. The representation holds in the half plane $\Re (e^{i\vartheta }{z}_0)>c$, where $\vartheta$ and $c$ are such that $c\mathbf{I}-[e^{i\vartheta }\mathbf{B}+e^{-i\vartheta }{\mathbf{B}}^{†}]$ is positive definite (and coercive).

16 pages, 1 figure

References in corpus (3)

• A unifying perspective on linear continuum equations prevalent in science. Part III: Canonical forms for dynamic equations with moduli that may, or may not, vary with time
• A unifying perspective on linear continuum equations prevalent in science. Part IV: Canonical forms for equations involving higher order gradients
• A unifying perspective on linear continuum equations prevalent in science. Part I: Canonical forms for static, steady, and quasistatic equations

Cited by in corpus (1)

• A unifying perspective on linear continuum equations prevalent in science. Part I: Canonical forms for static, steady, and quasistatic equations