Must a primitive non-deficient number have a component not much larger than its radical?
arXiv:2005.12115
Abstract
Let be a primitive non-deficient number where where are distinct primes. We prove that there exists an such that We conjecture that in fact one can always find an such that .
arXiv comment14 pages. This version tighter bounds than the first version due to a suggestion by Jan-Christoph Schlage-Puchta. A hole in one proof was cleaned up, and Conjecture 1 has been been weakened. Now appearing in the Journal of Integer Sequences