Not all interventions are equal for the height of the second peak
arXiv:2005.06880 · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109965
Abstract
In this paper we conduct a simulation study of the spread of an epidemic like COVID-19 with temporary immunity on finite spatial and non-spatial network models. In particular, we assume that an epidemic spreads stochastically on a scale-free network and that each infected individual in the network gains a temporary immunity after its infectious period is over. After the temporary immunity period is over, the individual becomes susceptible to the virus again. When the underlying contact network is embedded in Euclidean geometry, we model three different intervention strategies that aim to control the spread of the epidemic: social distancing, restrictions on travel, and restrictions on maximal number of social contacts per node. Our first finding is that on a finite network, a long enough average immunity period leads to extinction of the pandemic after the first peak, analogous to the concept of "herd immunity". For each model, there is a critical average immunity length above which this happens. Our second finding is that all three interventions manage to flatten the first peak (the travel restrictions most efficiently), as well as decrease the critical immunity length , but elongate the epidemic. However, when the average immunity length is shorter than , the price for the flattened first peak is often a high second peak: for limiting the maximal number of contacts, the second peak can be as high as 1/3 of the first peak, and twice as high as it would be without intervention. Thirdly, interventions introduce oscillations into the system and the time to reach equilibrium is, for almost all scenarios, much longer. We conclude that network-based epidemic models can show a variety of behaviors that are not captured by the continuous compartmental models.
arXiv comment17 pages text, 27 figures of which 22 in the appendix
References in corpus (23)
- Emergence of scaling in random networks
- Statistical mechanics of complex networks
- Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks
- Epidemic processes in complex networks
- The spread of epidemic disease on networks
- Evolution of networks
- Critical phenomena in complex networks
- Scaling and percolation in the small-world network model
- Epidemic outbreaks in complex heterogeneous networks
- Small But Slow World: How Network Topology and Burstiness Slow Down Spreading
- Origins of power-law degree distribution in the heterogeneity of human activity in social networks
- Dynamical Patterns of Cattle Trade Movements
- Contact processes on random graphs with power law degree distributions have critical value 0
- Greedy Forwarding in Dynamic Scale-Free Networks Embedded in Hyperbolic Metric Spaces
- Why are most COVID-19 infection curves linear?
- On the scaling of the chemical distance in long-range percolation models
- Diameters in preferential attachment models
- Stochastic lattice gas model describing the dynamics of an epidemic
- Recurrence versus Transience for Weight-Dependent Random Connection Models
- Average Distance in a General Class of Scale-Free Networks with Underlying Geometry
- Contact network models matching the dynamics of the COVID-19 spreading
- Scale-free network clustering in hyperbolic and other random graphs
- Why lockdown : On the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in India, a network approach