Contextuality versus Incompatibility
arXiv:2005.05124
Abstract
Our aim is to compare the fundamental notions of quantum physics - contextuality vs. incompatibility. One has to distinguish two different notions of contextuality, {\it Bohr-contextuality} and {\it Bell-contextuality}. The latter is defined operationally via violation of noncontextuality (Bell type) inequalities. This sort of contextuality will be compared with incompatibility. It is easy to show that, for quantum observables, there is {\it no contextuality without incompatibility.} The natural question arises: What is contextuality without incompatibility? (What is "dry-residue"?) Generally this is the very complex question. We concentrated on contextuality for four quantum observables. We shown that in the CHSH-scenarios (for "natural quantum observables") {\it contextuality is reduced to incompatibility.} However, generally contextuality without incompatibility may have some physical content. We found a mathematical constraint extracting the contextuality component from incompatibility. However, the physical meaning of this constraint is not clear. In appendix 1, we briefly discuss another sort of contextuality based on the Bohr's complementarity principle which is treated as the {\it contextuality-incompatibility principle}. Bohr-contextuality plays the crucial role in quantum foundations. Incompatibility is, in fact, a consequence of Bohr-contextuality. Finally, we remark that outside of physics, e.g., in cognitive psychology and decision making Bell-contextuality cleaned of incompatibility can play the important role.
arXiv commentdiscussion of 3-types of contextuality (introduction and appendix 1), discussion on Suppes-Zanotti and Boole inequalities vs. original Bell inequality for correlated observables (appendix 2)
References in corpus (8)
- All noncontextuality inequalities for the n-cycle scenario
- True Contextuality Beats Direct Influences in Human Decision Making
- Making Sense of Bell's Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality
- (Non-)Contextuality of Physical Theories as an Axiom
- Bohm-Bell type experiments: Classical probability approach to (no-)signaling and applications to quantum physics and psychology
- Proposed direct test of a certain type of noncontextuality in quantum mechanics
- Towards experiments to test violation of the original Bell inequality
- "Haunted" quantum contextuality