Continuum limit of lattice quasielectron wavefunctions
arXiv:2004.12205 · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac0f63
Abstract
Trial states describing anyonic quasiholes in the Laughlin state were found early on, and it is therefore natural to expect that one should also be able to create anyonic quasielectrons. Nevertheless, the existing trial wavefunctions for quasielectrons show behaviors that are not compatible with the expected topological properties or their construction involves ad hoc elements. It was shown, however, that for lattice fractional quantum Hall systems, it is possible to find a relatively simple quasielectron wavefunction that has all the expected properties [New J. Phys. 20, 033029 (2018)]. This naturally poses the question: what happens to this wavefunction in the continuum limit? Here we demonstrate that, although one obtains a finite continuum wavefunction when the quasielectron is on top of a lattice site, such a limit of the lattice quasielectron does not exist in general. In particular, if the quasielectron is put anywhere else than on a lattice site, the lattice wavefunction diverges when the continuum limit is approached. The divergence can be removed by projecting the state on the lowest Landau level, but we find that the projected state does also not have the properties expected for anyonic quasielectrons. We hence conclude that the lattice quasielectron wavefunction does not solve the difficulty of finding trial states for anyonic quasielectrons in the continuum.
20 pages, 7 figures
References in corpus (7)
- Fractional quantum Hall states at zero magnetic field
- Anyons and the quantum Hall effect - a pedagogical review
- Fractional Quantum Hall Effect in Optical Lattices
- Clustering Properties and Model Wavefunctions for Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Quasielectrons
- Anyon braiding in semi-analytical fractional quantum Hall lattice models
- Characterization of quasiholes in fractional Chern insulators
- Localized quasiholes and the Majorana fermion in fractional quantum Hall state at nu=5/2 via direct diagonalization