To Split or Not to Split: The Impact of Disparate Treatment in Classification
arXiv:2002.04788
Abstract
Disparate treatment occurs when a machine learning model yields different decisions for individuals based on a sensitive attribute (e.g., age, sex). In domains where prediction accuracy is paramount, it could potentially be acceptable to fit a model which exhibits disparate treatment. To evaluate the effect of disparate treatment, we compare the performance of split classifiers (i.e., classifiers trained and deployed separately on each group) with group-blind classifiers (i.e., classifiers which do not use a sensitive attribute). We introduce the benefit-of-splitting for quantifying the performance improvement by splitting classifiers. Computing the benefit-of-splitting directly from its definition could be intractable since it involves solving optimization problems over an infinite-dimensional functional space. Under different performance measures, we (i) prove an equivalent expression for the benefit-of-splitting which can be efficiently computed by solving small-scale convex programs; (ii) provide sharp upper and lower bounds for the benefit-of-splitting which reveal precise conditions where a group-blind classifier will always suffer from a non-trivial performance gap from the split classifiers. In the finite sample regime, splitting is not necessarily beneficial and we provide data-dependent bounds to understand this effect. Finally, we validate our theoretical results through numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
References in corpus (8)
- Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
- OpenML: networked science in machine learning
- Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discrimination
- On Fairness and Calibration
- On the (im)possibility of fairness
- Estimating Skin Tone and Effects on Classification Performance in Dermatology Datasets
- Fairer and more accurate, but for whom?
- Fairness With Minimal Harm: A Pareto-Optimal Approach For Healthcare