Understanding the Automated Parameter Optimization on Transfer Learning for CPDP: An Empirical Study

Abstract

Data-driven defect prediction has become increasingly important in software engineering process. Since it is not uncommon that data from a software project is insufficient for training a reliable defect prediction model, transfer learning that borrows data/knowledge from other projects to facilitate the model building at the current project, namely cross-project defect prediction (CPDP), is naturally plausible. Most CPDP techniques involve two major steps, i.e., transfer learning and classification, each of which has at least one parameter to be tuned to achieve their optimal performance. This practice fits well with the purpose of automated parameter optimization. However, there is a lack of thorough understanding about what are the impacts of automated parameter optimization on various CPDP techniques. In this paper, we present the first empirical study that looks into such impacts on 62 CPDP techniques, 13 of which are chosen from the existing CPDP literature while the other 49 ones have not been explored before. We build defect prediction models over 20 real-world software projects that are of different scales and characteristics. Our findings demonstrate that: (1) Automated parameter optimization substantially improves the defect prediction performance of 77\% CPDP techniques with a manageable computational cost. Thus more efforts on this aspect are required in future CPDP studies. (2) Transfer learning is of ultimate importance in CPDP. Given a tight computational budget, it is more cost-effective to focus on optimizing the parameter configuration of transfer learning algorithms (3) The research on CPDP is far from mature where it is "not difficult" to find a better alternative by making a combination of existing transfer learning and classification techniques. This finding provides important insights about the future design of CPDP techniques.

References in corpus (5)

• An Empirical Study on Software Defect Prediction with a Simplified Metric Set
• FEMOSAA: Feature Guided and Knee Driven Multi-Objective Optimization for Self-Adaptive Software
• How to "DODGE" Complex Software Analytics?
• A systematic mapping study on cross-project defect prediction
• Transfer-Learning Oriented Class Imbalance Learning for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

Cited by in corpus (4)

• How to Evaluate Solutions in Pareto-based Search-Based Software Engineering? A Critical Review and Methodological Guidance
• Synergizing Domain Expertise with Self-Awareness in Software Systems: A Patternized Architecture Guideline
• Hyperparameter Optimization for AST Differencing
• BiLO-CPDP: Bi-Level Programming for Automated Model Discovery in Cross-Project Defect Prediction