Resolving the Excess of Long GRBs at low redshift in the Swift Era

Abstract

Utilizing more than 100 long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) in the Swift-Ryan-2012 sample that include the observed redshifts and jet angles, Le & Mehta performed a timely study of the rate-density of LGRBs with an assumed broken power law GRB spectrum and obtained a GRB-burst-rate functional form that gives acceptable fits to the preSwift and Swift redshift and jet angle distributions. The results indicated an excess of LGRBs at redshift below $z\sim 2$ in the Swift sample. In this work, we are investigating if the excess is caused by the cosmological Hubble constant $H_0$, the $\gamma$-ray energy released $E_{\gamma }$, the low- and high-energy indices ($\alpha ,\beta$) of the Band function, the minimum and maximum jet angles ${\theta }_{\mathrm{j},\min }$ and ${\theta }_{\mathrm{j},\max }$, or that the excess is due to a biased in the Swift-Ryan-2012 sample. Our analyses indicate that none of the above physical parameters resolved the excess problem, but suggesting that the Swift-Ryan-2012~sample is biased with possible afterglow selection effect. The following model physical parameter values provide the best fit to the Swift-Ryan-2012 and preSwift~samples: the Hubble constant $H_0=72\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$, the energy released $E_{\gamma }\sim 4.47\times 10^{51}$ erg, the energy indices $\alpha \sim 0.9$ and $\beta \sim -2.13$, the jet angles of ${\theta }_{\mathrm{j},\max }\sim 0.8$ rad, and ${\theta }_{\mathrm{j},\min }\sim 0.065$ and $\sim 0.04$ rad for preSwift and Swift, respectively, $s\sim -1.55$ the jet angle power-law index, and a GRB formation rate that is similar to the Hopkins & Beacom observed star formation history and as extended by Li. Using the Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Host Galaxy Legacy Survey (SHOALS) Swift-Perley LGRB sample and applying the same physical parameter values as above, however, our model provides consistent results with this data set and indicating no excess of LGRBs at any redshift.

15 pages, 18 figures, accepted for publication in mnras, fixing tables layout (v2)

References in corpus (15)

• The Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts and Relativistic Jets
• Long gamma-ray bursts and core-collapse supernovae have different environments
• Star Formation History up to z = 7.4: Implications for Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Cosmic Metallicity Evolution
• The redshift distribution of SWIFT Gamma-Ray Bursts: evidence for evolution
• Gamma Ray Bursts Are Observed Off-Axis
• The Gamma Ray Burst Luminosity Function in the Light of the Swift 2-year Data
• Do long-duration GRBs follow star formation?
• Cosmological Evolution of Long Gamma-ray Bursts and Star Formation Rate
• An unexpectedly low-redshift excess of Swift gamma-ray burst rate
• Gamma Ray Bursts in the Swift-Fermi Era
• The Swift satellite and redshifts of long gamma-ray bursts
• Revisiting the Redshift Distribution of Gamma Ray Bursts in the Swift Era
• Resolving the Excess of Long GRBs at low redshift in the Swift Era
• A Catalog of Redshift Estimates for 1366 BATSE Long-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts: Evidence for Strong Selection Effects on the Phenomenological Prompt Gamma-Ray Correlations
• Status of GRB Observations with the Suzaku Wideband All-sky Monitor

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Revisiting the luminosity and redshift distributions of long gamma-ray bursts
• The Consequences of Gamma-ray Burst Jet Opening Angle Evolution on the Inferred Star Formation Rate
• Resolving the Excess of Long GRBs at low redshift in the Swift Era
• Does the Redshift Distribution of Swift Long GRBs Trace the Star-Formation Rate?