Enhanced Ability of Information Gathering May Intensify Disagreement Among Groups

Abstract

Today's society faces widening disagreement and conflicts among constituents with incompatible views. Escalated views and opinions are seen not only in radical ideology or extremism but also in many other scenes of our everyday life. Here we show that widening disagreement among groups may be linked to the advancement of information communication technology, by analyzing a mathematical model of population dynamics in a continuous opinion space. We adopted the interaction kernel approach to model enhancement of people's information gathering ability and introduced a generalized non-local gradient as individuals' perception kernel. We found that the characteristic distance between population peaks becomes greater as the wider range of opinions becomes available to individuals or the greater attention is attracted to opinions distant from theirs. These findings may provide a possible explanation for why disagreement is growing in today's increasingly interconnected society, without attributing its cause only to specific individuals or events.

arXiv comment11 pages, 6 figures; accepted for publication in Physical Review E

References in corpus (8)

• Complex Patterns in a Simple System
• Measuring Political Polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela
• Opinion Polarization by Learning from Social Feedback
• The Rise of Jihadist Propaganda on Social Networks
• Generalized Gelation Theory describes Human Online Aggregation in support of Extremism
• Social Diffusion and Global Drift on Networks
• A review of mechanistic and data-driven models of terrorism and radicalization
• Health Wars and Beyond: The Rapidly Expanding and Efficient Network Insurgency Interlinking Local and Global Online Crowds of Distrust