Online Abuse toward Candidates during the UK General Election 2019: Working Paper
arXiv:2001.08686
Abstract
The 2019 UK general election took place against a background of rising online hostility levels toward politicians and concerns about its impact on democracy. We collected 4.2 million tweets sent to or from election candidates in the six week period spanning from the start of November until shortly after the December 12th election. We found abuse in 4.46\% of replies received by candidates, up from 3.27\% in the matching period for the 2017 UK general election. Abuse levels have also been climbing month on month throughout 2019. Abuse also escalated throughout the campaign period. Abuse focused mainly on a small number of high profile politicians. Abuse is "spiky", triggered by external events such as debates, or certain tweets. Abuse increases when politicians discuss inflammatory topics such as borders and immigration. There may also be a backlash on topics such as social justice. Some tweets may become viral targets for personal abuse. On average, men received more general and political abuse; women received more sexist abuse. MPs choosing not to stand again had received more abuse during 2019.
Second draft, January 30th 2020
References in corpus (5)
- Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
- Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
- A large-scale crowdsourced analysis of abuse against women journalists and politicians on Twitter
- Online Abuse of UK MPs from 2015 to 2019: Working Paper
- Race and Religion in Online Abuse towards UK Politicians: Working Paper