Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing
arXiv:2001.00973
Abstract
Rising concern for the societal implications of artificial intelligence systems has inspired a wave of academic and journalistic literature in which deployed systems are audited for harm by investigators from outside the organizations deploying the algorithms. However, it remains challenging for practitioners to identify the harmful repercussions of their own systems prior to deployment, and, once deployed, emergent issues can become difficult or impossible to trace back to their source. In this paper, we introduce a framework for algorithmic auditing that supports artificial intelligence system development end-to-end, to be applied throughout the internal organization development lifecycle. Each stage of the audit yields a set of documents that together form an overall audit report, drawing on an organization's values or principles to assess the fit of decisions made throughout the process. The proposed auditing framework is intended to contribute to closing the accountability gap in the development and deployment of large-scale artificial intelligence systems by embedding a robust process to ensure audit integrity.
Accepted to ACM FAT* (Fariness, Accountability and Transparency) conference 2020. Full workable templates for the documents of the SMACTR framework presented in the paper can be found here https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GWlq8qGZXb2lNHxWBuo2wl-rlHsjNPM0?usp=sharing
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- The Fallacy of AI Functionality
- Accountability in an Algorithmic Society: Relationality, Responsibility, and Robustness in Machine Learning
- Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chains
- Deliberating with AI: Improving Decision-Making for the Future through Participatory AI Design and Stakeholder Deliberation
- Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"
- Stronger Together: on the Articulation of Ethical Charters, Legal Tools, and Technical Documentation in ML
- Crowdsourcing Impacts: Exploring the Utility of Crowds for Anticipating Societal Impacts of Algorithmic Decision Making
- Subverting Fair Image Search with Generative Adversarial Perturbations
- Towards Audit Requirements for AI-based Systems in Mobility Applications