Competing Activists--Political Polarization
arXiv:1910.14531 · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.123713
Abstract
Recent empirical findings suggest that societies have become more polarized in various countries. That is, the median voter of today represents a smaller fraction of society compared to two decades ago and yet, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not fully understood. Since interactions between influential actors ("activists") and voters play a major role in opinion formation, e.g. through social media, we develop a macroscopic opinion model in which competing activists spread their political ideas in specific groups of society. These ideas spread further to other groups in declining strength. While unilateral spreading shifts the opinion distribution, competition of activists leads to additional phenomena: Small heterogeneities among competing activists cause them to target different groups in society, which amplifies polarization. For moderate heterogeneities, we obtain target cycles and further amplification of polarization. In such cycles, the stronger activist differentiates himself from the weaker one, while the latter aims to imitate the stronger activist.
21 pages, 11 figures
References in corpus (6)
- Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey
- The role of inflexible minorities in the breaking of democratic opinion dynamics
- Critical behaviors in contagion dynamics
- Chaotic, staggered and polarized dynamics in opinion forming: the contrarian effect
- Temporal dynamics of online petitions
- Targeted Recovery as an Effective Strategy against Epidemic Spreading