Experimental Comparison of Bohm-like Theories with Different Ontologies

Abstract

The de Broglie-Bohm theory is a hidden variable interpretation of quantum mechanics which involves particles moving through space with definite trajectories. This theory singles out position as the primary ontological variable. Mathematically, it is possible to construct a similar theory where particles are moving through momentum space, and momentum is singled out as the primary ontological variable. In this paper we experimentally show how the two theories lead to different ontological descriptions. We construct the putative particle trajectories for a two-slit experiment in both the position and momentum space theories by simulating particle dynamics with coherent light. Using a method for constructing trajectories through the primary and derived (i.e. non-primary) spaces, we compare the ontological pictures offered by the two theories and show that they do not agree. This contradictory behaviour brings into question which ontology for Bohmian mechanics is to be preferred.

References in corpus (8)

• Colloquium: Understanding Quantum Weak Values: Basics and Applications
• Grounding Bohmian Mechanics in Weak Values and Bayesianism
• De Broglie-Bohm Guidance Equations for Arbitrary Hamiltonians
• Experimental observation of anomalous trajectories of single photons
• Experimental nonlocal steering of Bohmian trajectories
• Observing momentum disturbance in double-slit "which-way" measurements
• Modal dynamics for positive operator measures
• On Epstein's trajectory model of non-relativistic quantum mechanics

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Identifying weak values with intrinsic dynamical properties in Modal theories
• Assessing Quantum Thermalization in Physical and Configuration Spaces via Many-Body Weak Values
• Revealing the propagation dynamic of Laguerre-Gaussian beam with two Bohm-like theories
• Kinetic energy equipartition: a tool to characterize quantum thermalization
• Time Derivatives of Weak Values