Deep Learning for Prostate Pathology
arXiv:1910.04918
Abstract
The current study detects different morphologies related to prostate pathology using deep learning models; these models were evaluated on 2,121 hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain histology images captured using bright field microscopy, which spanned a variety of image qualities, origins (whole slide, tissue micro array, whole mount, Internet), scanning machines, timestamps, H&E staining protocols, and institutions. For case usage, these models were applied for the annotation tasks in clinician-oriented pathology reports for prostatectomy specimens. The true positive rate (TPR) for slides with prostate cancer was 99.7% by a false positive rate of 0.785%. The F1-scores of Gleason patterns reported in pathology reports ranged from 0.795 to 1.0 at the case level. TPR was 93.6% for the cribriform morphology and 72.6% for the ductal morphology. The correlation between the ground truth and the prediction for the relative tumor volume was 0.987 n. Our models cover the major components of prostate pathology and successfully accomplish the annotation tasks.
References in corpus (8)
- Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
- Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
- EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
- DenseNet: Implementing Efficient ConvNet Descriptor Pyramids
- Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Improving Gleason Scoring of Prostate Cancer
- Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networks
- An attention-based multi-resolution model for prostate whole slide imageclassification and localization
- Plexus Convolutional Neural Network (PlexusNet): A novel neural network architecture for histologic image analysis