Historical and Philosophical Insights about General Relativity and Space-time from Particle Physics
arXiv:1909.13642
Abstract
Historians recently rehabilitated Einstein's "physical strategy" for General Relativity (GR). Independently, particle physicists similarly re-derived Einstein's equations for a massless spin 2 field. But why not a light \emph{massive} spin 2, like Neumann and Seeliger did to Newton? Massive gravities are bimetric, supporting conventionalism over geometric empiricism. Nonuniqueness lets field equations explain geometry but not \emph{vice versa}. Massive gravity would have blocked Schlick's critique of Kant's synthetic \emph{a priori}. Finally in 1970 massive spin 2 gravity seemed unstable or empirically falsified. GR was vindicated, but later and on better grounds. However, recently dark energy and theoretical progress have made massive spin 2 gravity potentially viable again.
Proceedings of SILFS 2014: University of Rome `Roma TRE', 18-20 June 2014. http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/downloads/silfs00029.pdf. One reference added
References in corpus (4)
- Resummation of Massive Gravity
- The recovery of General Relativity in massive gravity via the Vainshtein mechanism
- Acausality of Massive Gravity
- Permanent Underdetermination from Approximate Empirical Equivalence in Field Theory: Massless and Massive Scalar Gravity, Neutrino, Electromagnetic, Yang-Mills and Gravitational Theories