The problem of quantum correlations and the totalitarian principle

Abstract

The totalitarian principle establishes that `anything not forbidden is compulsory'. The problem of quantum correlations is explaining what selects the set of quantum correlations for a Bell and Kochen-Specker (KS) contextuality scenario. Here, we show that two assumptions and a version of the totalitarian principle lead to the quantum correlations. The assumptions are that there is a non-empty set of correlations for any KS contextuality scenario and a statistically independent realisation of any two KS experiments. The version of the totalitarian principle says that any correlation not forbidden by these assumptions can be produced. This paper contains a short version of the proof [presented in {\em Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{100}, 032120 (2019)] and explores some implications of the result. This article is part of the theme issue `Contextuality and probability in quantum mechanics and beyond'.

18 pages, 2 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1801.06347

References in corpus (12)

• A simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 system
• Experimentally testable state-independent quantum contextuality
• A derivation of quantum theory from physical requirements
• Almost quantum correlations
• Simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality
• Logical Bell Inequalities
• Higher-order interference and single-system postulates characterizing quantum theory
• Universality of state-independent violation of correlation inequalities for noncontextual theories
• Simulating quantum systems using real Hilbert spaces
• On Zurek's derivation of the Born rule
• Bounding quantum contextuality with lack of third-order intereference
• Simple explanation of the quantum limits of genuine $n$-body nonlocality