Avoiding Resentment Via Monotonic Fairness
arXiv:1909.01251
Abstract
Classifiers that achieve demographic balance by explicitly using protected attributes such as race or gender are often politically or culturally controversial due to their lack of individual fairness, i.e. individuals with similar qualifications will receive different outcomes. Individually and group fair decision criteria can produce counter-intuitive results, e.g. that the optimal constrained boundary may reject intuitively better candidates due to demographic imbalance in similar candidates. Both approaches can be seen as introducing individual resentment, where some individuals would have received a better outcome if they either belonged to a different demographic class and had the same qualifications, or if they remained in the same class but had objectively worse qualifications (e.g. lower test scores). We show that both forms of resentment can be avoided by using monotonically constrained machine learning models to create individually fair, demographically balanced classifiers.
References in corpus (9)
- Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
- Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)
- Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
- Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representations
- A Convex Framework for Fair Regression
- From Parity to Preference-based Notions of Fairness in Classification
- Does mitigating ML's impact disparity require treatment disparity?
- Envy-Free Classification
- Fair Algorithms for Infinite and Contextual Bandits