Robust Registration of Astronomy Catalogs with Applications to the Hubble Space Telescope

Abstract

Astrometric calibration of images with a small field of view is often inferior to the internal accuracy of the source detections due to the small number of accessible guide stars. One important experiment with such challenges is the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). A possible solution is to cross-calibrate overlapping fields instead of just relying on standard stars. Following the approach of \citet{2012ApJ...761..188B}, we use infinitesimal 3D rotations for fine-tuning the calibration but devise a better objective that is robust to a large number of false candidates in the initial set of associations. Using Bayesian statistics, we accommodate bad data by explicitly modeling the quality, which yields a formalism essentially identical to an $M$-estimation in robust statistics. Our results on simulated and real catalogs show great potentials for improving the HST calibration, and those with similar challenges.

References in corpus (13)

• The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
• Gaia Data Release 2: The astrometric solution
• Astrometry.net: Blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images
• Bayesian Estimation of Hardness Ratios: Modeling and Computations
• Representations of world coordinates in FITS
• Probabilistic Cross-Identification of Astronomical Sources
• Version 1 of the Hubble Source Catalog
• Probabilistic record linkage in astronomy: Directional cross-identification and beyond
• Catalog Matching with Astrometric Correction and its Application to the Hubble Legacy Archive
• Cross-Identification of Stars with Unknown Proper Motions
• Cross-Identification Performance from Simulated Detections: GALEX and SDSS
• Probabilistic Cross-Identification in Crowded Fields as an Assignment Problem
• Probabilistic Cross-Identification of Galaxies with Realistic Clustering