Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide

Abstract

Wikipedia articles about places, OpenStreetMap features, and other forms of peer-produced content have become critical sources of geographic knowledge for humans and intelligent technologies. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of the peer production model across the rural/urban divide, a divide that has been shown to be an important factor in many online social systems. We find that in both Wikipedia and OpenStreetMap, peer-produced content about rural areas is of systematically lower quality, is less likely to have been produced by contributors who focus on the local area, and is more likely to have been generated by automated software agents (i.e. bots). We then codify the systemic challenges inherent to characterizing rural phenomena through peer production and discuss potential solutions.

10 pages, published on CHI'16

Cited by in corpus (10)

• The Geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and Problematic Effects on Places and Movement
• The Dimensions of Data Labor: A Road Map for Researchers, Activists, and Policymakers to Empower Data Producers
• Sharing Heartbeats: Motivations of Citizen Scientists in Times of Crises
• CASS: Towards Building a Social-Support Chatbot for Online Health Community
• Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companies
• Increasing Participation in Peer Production Communities with the Newcomer Homepage
• "We Need a Woman in Music": Exploring Wikipedia's Values on Article Priority
• Uneven Coverage of Natural Disasters in Wikipedia: the Case of Flood
• MobInsight: A Framework Using Semantic Neighborhood Features for Localized Interpretations of Urban Mobility
• From Asking to Answering: Getting More Involved on Stack Overflow