AI and Accessibility: A Discussion of Ethical Considerations
arXiv:1908.08939 · doi:10.1145/3356727
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, more than one billion people worldwide have disabilities. The field of disability studies defines disability through a social lens; people are disabled to the extent that society creates accessibility barriers. AI technologies offer the possibility of removing many accessibility barriers; for example, computer vision might help people who are blind better sense the visual world, speech recognition and translation technologies might offer real time captioning for people who are hard of hearing, and new robotic systems might augment the capabilities of people with limited mobility. Considering the needs of users with disabilities can help technologists identify high-impact challenges whose solutions can advance the state of AI for all users; however, ethical challenges such as inclusivity, bias, privacy, error, expectation setting, simulated data, and social acceptability must be considered.
Preprint of a "Viewpoint" column that was published in the Communications of the ACM in May/June 2020
Cited by in corpus (11)
- Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes
- LaMPost: Design and Evaluation of an AI-assisted Email Writing Prototype for Adults with Dyslexia
- Data Representativeness in Accessibility Datasets: A Meta-Analysis
- Artificial Intelligence and Diabetes Mellitus: An Inside Look Through the Retina
- Contributing to Accessibility Datasets: Reflections on Sharing Study Data by Blind People
- Understanding How Blind Users Handle Object Recognition Errors: Strategies and Challenges
- Sharing Practices for Datasets Related to Accessibility and Aging
- Identifying Crucial Objects in Blind and Low-Vision Individuals' Navigation
- AccessShare: Co-designing Data Access and Sharing with Blind People
- Real-Time Hand Gesture Recognition: Integrating Skeleton-Based Data Fusion and Multi-Stream CNN
- Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions