A grouped, selectively weighted false discovery rate procedure

Abstract

False discovery rate (FDR) control in structured hypotheses testing is an important topic in simultaneous inference. Most existing methods that aim to utilize group structure among hypotheses either employ the groupwise mixture model or weight all p-values or hypotheses. Thus, their powers can be improved when the groupwise mixture model is inappropriate or when most groups contain only true null hypotheses. Motivated by this, we propose a grouped, selectively weighted FDR procedure, which we refer to as "sGBH". Specifically, without employing the groupwise mixture model, sGBH identifies groups of hypotheses of interest, weights p-values in each such group only, and tests only the selected hypotheses using the weighted p-values. The sGBH subsumes a standard grouped, weighted FDR procedure which we refer to as "GBH". We provide simple conditions to ensure the conservativeness of sGBH, together with empirical evidence on its much improved power over GBH. The new procedure is applied to a gene expression study.

arXiv comment43 pages; 16 figures

References in corpus (7)

• Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures
• Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses
• Multiple testing with discrete data: proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures
• A weighted FDR procedure under discrete and heterogeneous null distributions
• Adaptive Controls of FWER and FDR Under Block Dependence
• Uniformly consistently estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses via Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral equations
• Adapting BH to One- and Two-Way Classified Structures of Hypotheses