Comparison of aluminum oxide empirical potentials from cluster to nanoparticle

Abstract

Aluminum oxide nanoparticles are increasingly sought in numerous technological applications. However, as the nanoparticles grow during the synthesis, two phase transitions occur. At the nanoscale, numerical simulation of the stability of the alumina phases requires the use of empirical potentials that are reliable over a large range of system sizes going from a few atoms to several hundred thousand atoms. In this work, we confronted four different empirical potentials that are currently employed for bulk alumina. We found that only two of them are correct at the molecular level when compared to DFT calculations. Furthermore, the two potentials remain the best at the nanoscale as they reproduce one or two phase transitions that were observed experimentally: from amorphous solid to cubic crystal (γ) and from cubic to hexagonal (α, i.e. corundum) crystal.

arXiv comment11 pages, 8 pdf figures, 1 supplemental material pdf file, accepted in Physical Review B

References in corpus (5)

• Canonical sampling through velocity-rescaling
• Structure evolution of nanoparticulate Fe2O3
• Atomistic Mechanisms for the Nucleation of Aluminium Oxide Nanoparticles
• A global optimisation study of the low-lying isomers of the alumina octomer (Al${}_2$O${}_3$)${}_8$
• Alloy, Janus and core-shell nanoparticles: Numerical modeling of their nucleation and growth in physical synthesis

Cited by in corpus (4)

• Bottom-up dust nucleation theory in oxygen-rich evolved stars I. Aluminium oxide clusters
• Simulating the fabrication of aluminium oxide tunnel junctions
• Out-of-equilibrium Polymorph Selection in Nanoparticle Freezing
• Exploring the energy landscape of aluminas through machine learning interatomic potential