Knapsack Problem variants of QAOA for battery revenue optimisation
arXiv:1908.02210
Abstract
We implement two Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) variants for a battery revenue optimisation problem, equivalent to the weakly NP-hard Knapsack Problem. Both approaches investigate how to tackle constrained problems with QAOA. A first 'constrained' approach introduces a quadratic penalty to enforce the constraint to be respected strictly and reformulates the problem into an Ising Problem. However, simulations on IBM's simulator highlight non-convergent results for intermediate depth (). A second 'relaxed' approach applies the QAOA with a non-Ising target function to compute a linear penalty, running in time and needing qubits. Simulations reveal an exponential improvement over the number of depth levels and obtain approximations about of the optimum with shallow depth ().
References in corpus (9)
- A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem
- A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
- Quantum Networks for Elementary Arithmetic Operations
- From the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm to a Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz
- Quantum Optimization of Maximum Independent Set using Rydberg Atom Arrays
- Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm for MaxCut: A Fermionic View
- Performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on the Maximum Cut Problem
- An Elementary Proof of the Quantum Adiabatic Theorem
- Adiabatic quantum computing solution of the knapsack problem
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithms
- NISQ Computers: A Path to Quantum Supremacy
- Elementary Proof of QAOA Convergence
- Prog-QAOA: Framework for resource-efficient quantum optimization through classical programs
- Symmetry-based quantum algorithms for open-shop scheduling with hard constraints
- QPack: Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithms as universal benchmark for quantum computers