B-meson production in the general-mass variable-flavour-number scheme and LHC data
arXiv:1907.12456 · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7326-y
Abstract
We study inclusive -meson production in collisions at the LHC and compare experimental data with predictions of the general-mass variable-flavour-number scheme at next-to-leading order of perturbative QCD. We find almost perfect agreement provided that the factorization scale parameters and the parton distribution functions are chosen appropriately.
arXiv comment15 pages, 12 figures
References in corpus (11)
- New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics
- Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs
- Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC
- Inclusive D^{*+-} Production in p p-bar Collisions with Massive Charm Quarks
- Collinear Subtractions in Hadroproduction of Heavy Quarks
- Finite-Mass Effects on Inclusive B-Meson Hadroproduction
- Revisiting the D-meson hadroproduction in general-mass variable flavour number scheme
- Prompt neutrinos from atmospheric charm in the general-mass variable-flavor-number scheme
- Inclusive B-Meson Production at the LHC in the GM-VFN Scheme
- -hadron fragmentation functions at next-to-next-to-leading order from global analysis of annihilation data
- Inclusive B-meson production at small p_T in the general-mass variable-flavor-number scheme
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Bottom-quark production at hadron colliders: fully differential predictions in NNLO QCD
- Prompt and non-prompt J/ production cross sections at midrapidity in proton-proton collisions at = 5.02 and 13 TeV
- B-meson hadroproduction in the SACOT- scheme
- Neural Network QCD analysis of charged hadron Fragmentation Functions in the presence of SIDIS data
- B-hadron production at the LHC from bottom-quark pair production at NNLO+PS
- First NNLO fragmentation functions of and and their uncertainties in the presence of hadron mass corrections
- Cross sections of inclusive and production from -hadron decays in collisions and comparison with ATLAS and CMS data