paper

Improved Budgeted Connected Domination and Budgeted Edge-Vertex Domination

arXiv:1907.06576

Abstract

We consider the \emph{Budgeted} version of the classical \emph{Connected Dominating Set} problem (BCDS). Given a graph and a budget , we seek a connected subset of at most vertices maximizing the number of dominated vertices in . We improve over the previous approximation in [Khuller, Purohit, and Sarpatwar,\ \emph{SODA 2014}] by introducing a new method for performing tree decompositions in the analysis of the last part of the algorithm. This new approach provides a approximation guarantee. By generalizing the analysis of the first part of the algorithm, we are able to modify it appropriately and obtain a further improvement to . On the other hand, we prove a inapproximability bound, for any . We also examine the \emph{edge-vertex domination} variant, where an edge dominates its endpoints and all vertices neighboring them. In \emph{Budgeted Edge-Vertex Domination} (BEVD), we are given a graph , and a budget , and we seek a, not necessarily connected, subset of edges such that the number of dominated vertices in is maximized. We prove there exists a -approximation algorithm. Also, for any , we present a -inapproximability result by a gap-preserving reduction from the \emph{maximum coverage} problem. Finally, we examine the "dual" \emph{Partial Edge-Vertex Domination} (PEVD) problem, where a graph and a quota are given. The goal is to select a minimum-size set of edges to dominate at least vertices in . In this case, we present a -approximation algorithm by a reduction to the \emph{partial cover} problem.

17 pages, improved results, to appear

Improved Budgeted Connected Domination and Budgeted Edge-Vertex Domination · wovepaper