On the reliability of magnetic energy and helicity computations based on nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field models
arXiv:1907.01179 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2e73
Abstract
We demonstrate the sensitivity of magnetic energy and helicity computations regarding the quality of the underlying coronal magnetic field model. We apply the method of Wiegelmann & Inhester (2010) to a series of SDO/HMI vector magnetograms, and discuss nonlinear force-free (NLFF) solutions based on two different sets of the free model parameters. The two time series differ from each other concerning their force-free and solenoidal quality. Both force- and divergence-freeness are required for a consistent NLFF solution. Full satisfaction of the solenoidal property is inherent in the definition of relative magnetic helicity in order to insure gauge-independence. We apply two different magnetic helicity computation methods (Thalmann et al. 2011; Valori et al. 2012) to both NLFF time series and find that the output is highly dependent on the level to which the NLFF magnetic fields satisfy the divergence-free condition, with the computed magnetic energy being less sensitive than the relative helicity. Proxies for the non-potentiality and eruptivity derived from both quantities are also shown to depend strongly on the solenoidal property of the NLFF fields. As a reference for future applications, we provide quantitative thresholds for the force- and divergence-freeness, for the assurance of reliable computation of magnetic energy and helicity, and of their related eruptivity proxies.
8 pages, 4 Figures, 1 Table, accepted for publication in ApJ Letters
References in corpus (6)
- The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Vector Magnetic Field Pipeline: SHARPs -- Space-weather HMI Active Region Patches
- The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) Vector Magnetic Field Pipeline: Overview and Performance
- Preprocessing of vector magnetograph data for a non-linear force-free magnetic field reconstruction
- Magnetic helicity estimations in models and observations of the solar magnetic field. Part I: Finite volume methods
- On the Helicity of Open Magnetic Fields
- Validation and Benchmarking of a Practical Free Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budget Calculation in Solar Magnetic Structures
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Magnetic helicity budget of solar active regions prolific of eruptive and confined flares
- Magnetic helicity and energy budget around large confined and eruptive solar flares
- The 2019 International Women's Day event: A two-step solar flare with multiple eruptive signatures and low Earth impact
- The effect of spatial sampling on magnetic field modeling and helicity computation
- Comparison of Two Methods for Calculating Magnetic Helicity in the Solar Corona
- How flux feeding causes eruptions of solar magnetic flux ropes with the hyperbolic flux tube configuration?