Compositional Questions Do Not Necessitate Multi-hop Reasoning
arXiv:1906.02900
Abstract
Multi-hop reading comprehension (RC) questions are challenging because they require reading and reasoning over multiple paragraphs. We argue that it can be difficult to construct large multi-hop RC datasets. For example, even highly compositional questions can be answered with a single hop if they target specific entity types, or the facts needed to answer them are redundant. Our analysis is centered on HotpotQA, where we show that single-hop reasoning can solve much more of the dataset than previously thought. We introduce a single-hop BERT-based RC model that achieves 67 F1---comparable to state-of-the-art multi-hop models. We also design an evaluation setting where humans are not shown all of the necessary paragraphs for the intended multi-hop reasoning but can still answer over 80% of questions. Together with detailed error analysis, these results suggest there should be an increasing focus on the role of evidence in multi-hop reasoning and possibly even a shift towards information retrieval style evaluations with large and diverse evidence collections.
Published as a conference paper at ACL 2019 (short). Code available at https://github.com/shmsw25/single-hop-rc
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Invariant Rationalization
- Beyond Leaderboards: A survey of methods for revealing weaknesses in Natural Language Inference data and models
- Do Multi-hop Readers Dream of Reasoning Chains?
- Quizbowl: The Case for Incremental Question Answering
- Graph Sequential Network for Reasoning over Sequences
- Complementary Evidence Identification in Open-Domain Question Answering
- Towards Non-task-specific Distillation of BERT via Sentence Representation Approximation
- Mitigating the Position Bias of Transformer Models in Passage Re-Ranking
- NOAHQA: Numerical Reasoning with Interpretable Graph Question Answering Dataset
- Can Edge Probing Tasks Reveal Linguistic Knowledge in QA Models?