Gradient-enhanced statistical analysis of cleavage fracture
arXiv:1905.03221 · doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.05.002
Abstract
We present a probabilistic framework for brittle fracture that builds upon Weibull statistics and strain gradient plasticity. The constitutive response is given by the mechanism-based strain gradient plasticity theory, aiming to accurately characterize crack tip stresses by accounting for the role of plastic strain gradients in elevating local strengthening ahead of cracks. It is shown that gradients of plastic strain elevate the Weibull stress and the probability of failure for a given choice of the threshold stress and the Weibull parameters. The statistical framework presented is used to estimate failure probabilities across temperatures in ferritic steels. The framework has the capability to estimate the three statistical parameters present in the Weibull-type model without any prior assumptions. The calibration against experimental data shows important differences in the values obtained for strain gradient plasticity and conventional J2 plasticity. Moreover, local probability maps show that potential damage initiation sites are much closer to the crack tip in the case of gradient-enhanced plasticity. Finally, the fracture response across the ductile-to-brittle regime is investigated by computing the cleavage resistance curves with increasing temperature. Gradient plasticity predictions appear to show a better agreement with the experiments.
References in corpus (8)
- Abaqus2Matlab: A suitable tool for finite element post-processing
- Strain gradient plasticity-based modeling of hydrogen environment assisted cracking
- On fracture in finite strain gradient plasticity
- Strain gradient plasticity modeling of hydrogen diffusion to the crack tip
- Modeling damage and fracture within strain-gradient plasticity
- The role of plastic strain gradients in the crack growth resistance of metals
- Non-local plasticity effects on notch fracture mechanics
- Mode I crack tip fields: strain gradient plasticity theory versus J2 flow theory