Oceanic Games: Centralization Risks and Incentives in Blockchain Mining
arXiv:1904.02368 · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37110-4_13
Abstract
To participate in the distributed consensus of permissionless blockchains, prospective nodes -- or miners -- provide proof of designated, costly resources. However, in contrast to the intended decentralization, current data on blockchain mining unveils increased concentration of these resources in a few major entities, typically mining pools. To study strategic considerations in this setting, we employ the concept of Oceanic Games, Milnor and Shapley (1978). Oceanic Games have been used to analyze decision making in corporate settings with small numbers of dominant players (shareholders) and large numbers of individually insignificant players, the ocean. Unlike standard equilibrium models, they focus on measuring the value (or power) per entity and per unit of resource} in a given distribution of resources. These values are viewed as strategic components in coalition formations, mergers and resource acquisitions. Considering such issues relevant to blockchain governance and long-term sustainability, we adapt oceanic games to blockchain mining and illustrate the defined concepts via examples. The application of existing results reveals incentives for individual miners to merge in order to increase the value of their resources. This offers an alternative perspective to the observed centralization and concentration of mining power. Beyond numerical simulations, we use the model to identify issues relevant to the design of future cryptocurrencies and formulate prospective research questions.
arXiv comment[Best Paper Award] at the International Conference on Mathematical Research for Blockchain Economy (MARBLE 2019)
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Weighted Voting on the Blockchain: Improving Consensus in Proof of Stake Protocols
- PREStO: A Systematic Framework for Blockchain Consensus Protocols
- Double-Spend Counterattacks: Threat of Retaliation in Proof-of-Work Systems
- Incentives Against Power Grabs or How to Engineer the Revolution in a Pooled Proof of Stake System
- A Difficulty in Controlling Blockchain Mining Costs via Cryptopuzzle Difficulty
- On the (De)centralization of FruitChains
- From Griefing to Stability in Blockchain Mining Economies
- The Convergence Rates of Blockchain Mining Games: A Markovian Approach
- A Peek into the Unobservable: Hidden States and Bayesian Inference for the Bitcoin and Ether Price Series
- Latus Incentive Scheme: Enabling Decentralization in Blockchains based on Recursive SNARKs