The case for two-dimensional galaxy-galaxy lensing

Abstract

We revisit the performance and biases of the two-dimensional approach to galaxy-galaxy lensing. This method exploits the information for the actual positions and ellipticities of source galaxies, rather than using only the ensemble properties of statistically equivalent samples. We compare the performance of this method with the traditionally used one-dimensional tangential shear signal on a set of mock data that resemble the current state-of-the-art weak lensing surveys. We find that under idealised circumstances the confidence regions of joint constraints for the amplitude and scale parameters of the NFW model in the two-dimensional analysis can be more than three times tighter than the one-dimensional results. Moreover, this improvement depends on the lens number density and it is larger for higher densities. We compare the method against the results from the hydrodynamical EAGLE simulation in order to test for possible biases that might arise due to lens galaxies being missed, and find that the method is able to return unbiased estimates of halo masses when compared to the true properties of the EAGLE galaxies. Because of its advantage in high galaxy density areas, the method is especially suitable for studying the properties of satellite galaxies in clusters of galaxies.

9 pages, 7 figures, accepted for publication in A&A

References in corpus (6)

• The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
• The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations
• Baryon effects on the internal structure of LCDM halos in the EAGLE simulations
• Dark matter halo properties of GAMA galaxy groups from 100 square degrees of KiDS weak lensing data
• The origin of scatter in the stellar mass - halo mass relation of central galaxies in the EAGLE simulation
• Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): The halo mass of galaxy groups from maximum-likelihood weak lensing