An alternative interpretation of the exomoon candidate signal in the combined Kepler and Hubble data of Kepler-1625

Abstract

Kepler and Hubble photometry of a total of four transits by the Jupiter-sized Kepler-1625b have recently been interpreted to show evidence of a Neptune-sized exomoon. The profound implications of this first possible exomoon detection and the physical oddity of the proposed moon, that is, its giant radius prompt us to re-examine the data and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) used for detection. We combine the Kepler data with the previously published Hubble light curve. In an alternative approach, we perform a synchronous polynomial detrending and fitting of the Kepler data combined with our own extraction of the Hubble photometry. We generate five million MCMC realizations of the data with both a planet-only model and a planet-moon model and compute the BIC difference (DeltaBIC) between the most likely models, respectively. DeltaBIC values of -44.5 (using previously published Hubble data) and -31.0 (using our own detrending) yield strongly support the exomoon interpretation. Most of our orbital realizations, however, are very different from the best-fit solutions, suggesting that the likelihood function that best describes the data is non-Gaussian. We measure a 73.7min early arrival of Kepler-1625b for its Hubble transit at the 3 sigma level, possibly caused by a 1 day data gap near the first Kepler transit, stellar activity, or unknown systematics. The radial velocity amplitude of a possible unseen hot Jupiter causing Kepler-1625b's transit timing variation could be some 100m/s. Although we find a similar solution to the planet-moon model as previously proposed, careful consideration of its statistical evidence leads us to believe that this is not a secure exomoon detection. Unknown systematic errors in the Kepler/Hubble data make the DeltaBIC an unreliable metric for an exomoon search around Kepler-1625b, allowing for alternative interpretations of the signal.

8 pages, 5 figures (4 col, 1 b/w), 1 Table, published in A&A, Vol. 624, A95

References in corpus (6)

• The Gaia mission
• DHP Framework: Digital Health Passports Using Blockchain -- Use case on international tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic
• HEK VI: On the Dearth of Galilean Analogs in Kepler and the Exomoon Candidate Kepler-1625b I
• Detecting extrasolar moons akin to solar system satellites with an orbital sampling effect
• How to determine an exomoon's sense of orbital motion
• Next Generation of Telescopes or Dynamics Required to Determine if Exo-Moons have Prograde or Retrograde Orbits

Cited by in corpus (16)

• An Exomoon Survey of 70 Cool Giant Exoplanets and the New Candidate Kepler-1708 b-i
• No Evidence for Lunar Transit in New Analysis of Hubble Space Telescope Observations of the Kepler-1625 System
• Solar System Physics for Exoplanet Research
• Exomoons in the habitable zones of M dwarfs
• Orbital Stability of Exomoons and Submoons with Applications to Kepler 1625b-I
• Presence of water on exomoons orbiting free-floating planets: a case study
• Can close-in giant exoplanets preserve detectable moons?
• Exploring formation scenarios for the exomoon candidate Kepler 1625b I
• Detectability of satellites around directly imaged exoplanets and brown dwarfs
• Pandora: A fast open-source exomoon transit detection algorithm
• A search for transit timing variations within the exomoon corridor using Kepler data
• Measuring the variability of directly imaged exoplanets using vector Apodizing Phase Plates combined with ground-based differential spectrophotometry
• Cronomoons: origin, dynamics, and light-curve features of ringed exomoons
• On the Stability of Additional Moons Orbiting Kepler-1625 b
• The Dynamics of Co-orbital Giant Exomoons -- Applications for the Kepler-1625 b and Kepler-1708 b Satellite Systems
• Enhanced thermal radiation from a tidally heated exomoon with a single hot spot