Imaging with flat optics: metalenses or diffractive lenses?

Abstract

Recently, there has been an explosion of interest in metalenses for imaging. The interest is primarily based on their sub-wavelength thicknesses. Diffractive lenses have been used as thin lenses since the late 19th century. Here, we show that multi-level diffractive lenses (MDLs), when designed properly can exceed the performance of metalenses. Furthermore, MDLs can be designed and fabricated with larger constituent features, making them accessible to low-cost, large area volume manufacturing, which is generally challenging for metalenses. The support substrate will dominate overall thickness for all flat optics. Therefore the advantage of a slight decrease in thickness (from ~2λ to ~λ/2) afforded by metalenses may not be useful. We further elaborate on the differences between these approaches and clarify that metalenses have unique advantages when manipulating the polarization states of light.

arXiv comment4 figures, 2 tables

References in corpus (12)

• Aberration-free ultra-thin flat lenses and axicons at telecom wavelengths based on plasmonic metasurfaces
• High-efficiency light-wave control with all-dielectric optical Huygens' metasurfaces
• Subwavelength-thick Lenses with High Numerical Apertures and Large Efficiency Based on High Contrast Transmitarrays
• Miniature optical planar camera based on a wide-angle metasurface doublet corrected for monochromatic aberrations
• Achromatic Metalens in the Visible and Metalens with Reverse Chromatic Dispersion
• A broadband achromatic polarization-insensitive metalens consisting of anisotropic nanostructures
• A Metalens with Near-Unity Numerical Aperture
• An Ultra-high Numerical Aperture Metalens at Visible Wavelengths
• Topology Optimized Multi-layered Meta-optics
• Designing large, high-efficiency, high-numerical-aperture, transmissive meta-lenses for visible light
• Solid-Immersion Metalenses for Infrared Focal Plane Arrays
• All-dielectric metasurface cylindrical lens