Assessing the Intrinsic Uncertainty and Structural Stability of Planetary Models: 1) Parameterized Thermal-Tectonic History Models

Abstract

Thermal history models, that have been used to understand the geological history of Earth, are now being coupled to climate models to map conditions that allow planets to maintain surface water over geologic time - a criteria considered crucial for life. However, the lack of intrinsic uncertainty assessment has blurred guidelines for how thermal history models can be used toward this end. A model, as a representation of something real, is not expected to be complete. Unmodeled effects are assumed to be small enough that the model maintains utility for the issue(s) it was designed to address. The degree to which this holds depends on how unmodeled factors affect the certainty of model predictions. We quantify this intrinsic uncertainty for several parameterized thermal history models (a widely used subclass of planetary models). Single perturbation analysis is used to determine the reactance time of different models. This provides a metric for how long it takes low amplitude, unmodeled effects to decay or grow. Reactance time is shown to scale inversely with the strength of the dominant feedback (negative or positive) within a model. A perturbed physics analysis is then used to determine uncertainty shadows for model outputs. This provides probability distributions for model predictions and tests the structural stability of a model. That is, do model predictions remain qualitatively similar, and within assumed model limits, in the face of intrinsic uncertainty. Once intrinsic uncertainty is accounted for, model outputs/predictions and comparisons to observational data should be treated in a probabilistic way.

arXiv comment20 pages, 10 figures

References in corpus (12)

• Radius and Structure models for the First Super-Earth Planet
• Geodynamics and Rate of Volcanism on Massive Earth-like Planets
• Mantle Dynamics in Super-Earths: Post-Perovskite Rheology and Self-Regulation of Viscosity
• The Role of Plate Tectonic-Climate Coupling and Exposed Land Area in the Development of Habitable Climates on Rocky Planets
• Exoplanet Biosignatures: Future Directions
• Indication of insensitivity of planetary weathering behavior and habitable zone to surface land fraction
• Whole planet coupling between climate, mantle, and core: Implications for the evolution of rocky planets
• Carbon cycling and habitability of Earth-size stagnant lid planets
• The persistence of oceans on Earth-like planets: insights from the deep-water cycle
• Long Term Planetary Habitability and the Carbonate-Silicate Cycle
• Effect of surface-mantle water exchange parameterizations on exoplanet ocean depths
• Different is More: The Value of Finding an Inhabited Planet that is Far From Earth 2.0

Cited by in corpus (3)

• Layered Uncertainty in Planetary Thermal History Models: Implications for Hypotheses Discrimination and Habitability Modeling
• Planetary thermal evolution models with tectonic transitions
• A Note on Planet Size and Cooling Rate