Robust Estimation of Causal Effects via High-Dimensional Covariate Balancing Propensity Score

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a robust method to estimate the average treatment effects in observational studies when the number of potential confounders is possibly much greater than the sample size. We first use a class of penalized M-estimators for the propensity score and outcome models. We then calibrate the initial estimate of the propensity score by balancing a carefully selected subset of covariates that are predictive of the outcome. Finally, the estimated propensity score is used to construct the inverse probability weighting estimator. We prove that the proposed estimator, which has the sample boundedness property, is root-n consistent, asymptotically normal, and semiparametrically efficient when the propensity score model is correctly specified and the outcome model is linear in covariates. More importantly, we show that our estimator remains root-n consistent and asymptotically normal so long as either the propensity score model or the outcome model is correctly specified. We provide valid confidence intervals in both cases and further extend these results to the case where the outcome model is a generalized linear model. In simulation studies, we find that the proposed methodology often estimates the average treatment effect more accurately than the existing methods. We also present an empirical application, in which we estimate the average causal effect of college attendance on adulthood political participation. Open-source software is available for implementing the proposed methodology.

References in corpus (8)

• Simultaneous analysis of Lasso and Dantzig selector
• For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis
• Robust Inference on Average Treatment Effects with Possibly More Covariates than Observations
• Double/Debiased Machine Learning for Treatment and Causal Parameters
• Model-assisted inference for treatment effects using regularized calibrated estimation with high-dimensional data
• Covariate Balancing Propensity Score by Tailored Loss Functions
• Regularized calibrated estimation of propensity scores with model misspecification and high-dimensional data
• Confidence Intervals for High-Dimensional Linear Regression: Minimax Rates and Adaptivity

Cited by in corpus (3)

• A unifying approach for doubly-robust ${\ell }_1$ regularized estimation of causal contrasts
• Optimal Covariate Balancing Conditions in Propensity Score Estimation
• Causal Inference of General Treatment Effects using Neural Networks with A Diverging Number of Confounders