A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments

Abstract

National exercises for the evaluation of research activity by universities are becoming regular practice in ever more countries. These exercises have mainly been conducted through the application of peer-review methods. Bibliometrics has not been able to offer a valid large-scale alternative because of almost overwhelming difficulties in identifying the true author of each publication. We will address this problem by presenting a heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometric datasets for large-scale research assessments. The application proposed concerns the Italian university system, consisting of 80 universities and a research staff of over 60,000 scientists. The key advantage of the proposed approach is the ease of implementation. The algorithms are of practical application and have considerably better scalability and expandability properties than state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches. Moreover, the performance in terms of precision and recall, which can be further improved, seems thoroughly adequate for the typical needs of large-scale bibliometric research assessments.

References in corpus (3)

• Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists
• Allocative efficiency in public research funding:can bibliometrics help?
• The measurement of italian universities' research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology

Cited by in corpus (16)

• A comparison of two approaches for measuring interdisciplinary research output: the disciplinary diversity of authors vs the disciplinary diversity of the reference list
• Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of co-authors of scientific publications
• Collecting large-scale publication data at the level of individual researchers: A practical proposal for author name disambiguation
• Individual research performance: a proposal for comparing apples to oranges
• A gender analysis of top scientists' collaboration behavior: evidence from Italy
• The collaboration behaviors of scientists in Italy: a field level analysis
• Gender bias in academic recruitment
• ORCID-linked labeled data for evaluating author name disambiguation at scale
• Generating automatically labeled data for author name disambiguation: An iterative clustering method
• Assessing the accuracy of the h and g indexes for measuring researchers' productivity
• A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions
• Specialization vs diversification in research activities: the extent, intensity and relatedness of field diversification by individual scientists
• A novel methodology to assess the scientific standing of nations at field level
• Comparison of research productivity of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities
• "Seed+Expand": A validated methodology for creating high quality publication oeuvres of individual researchers
• Authorship analysis of specialized vs diversified research output